The reaction to Simone Biles’ decision to withdraw from the Olympic competition due to mental health issues has sparked controversy. Critics argue that turning her decision into a moment of praise reflects poorly on society’s therapeutic approach, suggesting that it celebrates weakness rather than strength.

Some prominent figures, like J.D. Vance and Charlie Kirk, have harshly criticized Biles. Vance criticized her for quitting due to “twisties,” a dangerous condition where gymnasts lose control of their bodies mid-air, which can lead to serious injury. Kirk echoed similar sentiments, accusing Biles of being selfish and immature for not competing in the gold medal match, and even suggesting that her actions were a disgrace to the nation.

Biles, who struggled with the mental and physical demands of gymnastics, felt immense pressure and fear from both the public and media. She has been open about her challenges and the emotional toll, stating that the scrutiny and criticism made her feel like she was hated and that she might be banned from her country for not achieving gold.

Supporters argue that Biles’ decision to prioritize her mental health was an act of strength, not weakness. Former elite gymnast Sean Melton and others emphasize that dealing with the twisties is extremely dangerous and stressful. They suggest that mental health considerations are crucial for athletes, even if they are among the best in their sport.

Overall, the debate highlights a broader discussion about mental health in athletics and whether society should support athletes who prioritize their well-being over competition.