“Candace Owens Sparks Political Firestorm With Explosive Claims Against the Macrons — Officials Respond”**
In a development that has sent shockwaves through political circles in both Washington and Paris, conservative commentator Candace Owens has ignited a global controversy by alleging that French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron attempted to orchestrate an assassination attempt against her. The allegations, posted across her social media platforms, have triggered intense scrutiny, widespread disbelief, and a rapid response from officials who emphasize that such claims must be treated with extreme caution.
Owens published her statements online late Tuesday evening, writing that “a source close to the first couple” had informed her of an assassination plot tied directly to France’s presidential household. She further asserted that the White House and U.S. counterterrorism agencies had “confirmed receipt” of her report.
“As an update, both the White House and our counterterrorism agencies have confirmed receipt of what I reported publicly: Emmanuel Macron attempted to organize my assassination, per a source close to the first couple,” Owens wrote. She added, “For all of you who doubted my claims, you can now look to the President of the United States and our intelligence communities to issue a statement to confirm whether I am telling the truth.”
Owens also referenced the death of activist Charlie Kirk, alleging—without evidence—that French legionnaires were involved. “I will again state that the French legionnaires were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination but they did not act alone,” she wrote.
Her statements immediately sparked a political earthquake online. Supporters flooded her comment sections with messages of concern and solidarity, while critics accused her of spreading unfounded conspiracies that could inflame international tensions. Within minutes, hashtags referencing Owens, Macron, and international security began trending across platforms.
White House Reaction: “Receipt is not endorsement”
Shortly after Owens’ allegations went viral, a senior White House official clarified that while agencies “receive” thousands of claims, warnings, and reports from the public each year, acknowledging receipt does not validate the content.
“It is standard procedure for federal agencies to log any security-related communication from U.S. citizens,” the official said. “Receipt does not imply verification, agreement, or evidence.”
No U.S. agency has publicly stated that Owens’ claims have been verified, substantiated, or supported by intelligence. Officials stressed that any allegation of an international assassination plot is taken seriously — but also requires rigorous investigation before any conclusions can be drawn.
A second national security spokesperson, speaking on background, underscored the importance of caution:
“There is no confirmed intelligence indicating that the French government, or anyone associated with President Macron, has engaged in such activities. Claims of this magnitude must be evaluated carefully and responsibly.”
French Government Responds With Outrage
The French government reacted swiftly and unequivocally. A spokesperson for the Élysée Palace called the allegations “absurd,” “baseless,” and “dangerously irresponsible,” adding that the French government “categorically denies any involvement in harm toward any American citizen, including Ms. Owens.”
French media outlets have widely criticized the claims, calling them “fantastical,” “politically charged,” and “potentially damaging to diplomatic relations.” Several newspapers questioned why Owens would target the Macrons specifically, noting that she has no recent public interactions with French leadership.
One editorial from Le Monde stated, “This is the type of allegation that normally emerges from fictional political thrillers, not real-world diplomacy.”
Political Analysts Weigh In
Experts warn that allegations of international assassination plots — especially between longtime allies — can inflame tensions and fuel conspiracy ecosystems regardless of the truth.
Dr. Harris Levinson, a Georgetown professor of political communication, explained:
“When a high-profile figure releases claims this explosive without evidence, it forces governments into reactive positions and risks destabilizing public trust. Even without verification, the accusation alone becomes a political weapon.”
Others note that Owens has previously courted controversy through provocative statements, but emphasize that this incident is of an entirely different scale.
“This is not a policy disagreement or a rhetorical jab,” Levinson continued. “This is an accusation of attempted murder against a sitting head of state. It demands transparency, but also calm.”
Supporters Rally — Critics Demand Proof
Owens’ supporters argue that she has a track record of “speaking out when others stay silent,” and that her willingness to confront powerful institutions is precisely why they believe her.
“She’s never been afraid of backlash,” one supporter wrote. “If she says something happened, we want answers.”
Critics, however, insist that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence — evidence they say is currently absent.
“This is not the kind of allegation you make casually,” one analyst said. “Without proof, it risks becoming a dangerous conspiracy theory with real-world consequences.”
What Happens Next?
The White House has confirmed only one thing: they have received Owens’ report, as they receive many. They have not confirmed her allegations, nor have they suggested any evidence exists to support them.
Meanwhile, security agencies are obligated to review any potential threat report, regardless of its origin, but no official inquiry or conflict has been publicly announced.
France maintains that the claims are fabricated.
Owens has stated she will continue to press for an official clarification from the President of the United States.
For now, the world watches — caught between shock, skepticism, and the urgent need for clear, factual answers. In an era where misinformation spreads instantly and political tensions run high, this controversy underscores how powerful — and volatile — an unverified allegation can be.
