Mel Gibson’s latest film, “Sound of Freedom,” has sparked controversy and speculation about Hollywood’s potential involvement in human trafficking. The film, which focuses on a former government agent’s mission to rescue trafficked children in Colombia, has grossed nearly $100 million worldwide against a $14 million budget. Despite its success, mainstream media and major streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney, and Amazon have largely refused to support or distribute the film.
Gibson, known for being an outspoken critic of Hollywood since the 1990s, and the film’s star, Jim Caviezel, have suggested that powerful elites in the industry may be implicated in global trafficking rings. In interviews, Caviezel mentioned the concept of “Adrenochrome,” linking it to a demand for trafficked children, and hinted that Jeffrey Epstein is not the only predator with a private island.
Gibson has claimed that his early experiences in Hollywood revealed a “dark energy” and troubling attitudes toward women among some industry figures. He recounted disturbing comments made by a producer about women in film, suggesting that many in Hollywood are spiritually unwell.
Tim Ballard, the real-life anti-trafficking activist portrayed by Caviezel, accused mainstream media of discrediting “Sound of Freedom” to protect the elites involved in trafficking. He stressed that the film is based on true events and criticized media outlets for labeling it as a conspiracy theory. Ballard believes that the film will encourage important discussions about trafficking, which some in the media are eager to avoid.
Fans have noted the hypocrisy of media platforms that allow much more disturbing content while suppressing “Sound of Freedom.” Reports have surfaced suggesting that Disney attempted to stifle the film’s release, despite it being completed in 2018. The movie languished for years, moving between studios until it was finally picked up by 20th Century Fox, which was subsequently acquired by Disney.
Additionally, viewers have claimed that theaters are intentionally making it difficult to watch the film, citing experiences of forced evacuations and uncomfortable conditions during screenings. Many fans believe these actions are part of a broader effort to undermine the film’s success.
Celebrities have largely remained silent about “Sound of Freedom,” leading fans to question their commitment to activism regarding child protection. Notably, Oprah Winfrey faced backlash for her comments on the film, which many perceived as dismissive of victims’ experiences. Critics have pointed out her past support for accusers of other high-profile figures while ignoring Gibson’s efforts to shed light on trafficking.
As the discussion around “Sound of Freedom” continues, supporters praise Gibson for bringing attention to significant issues, while others speculate about Hollywood’s potential motivations for suppressing the film. The situation raises questions about the industry’s transparency and accountability regarding serious social issues.
