The debate over Caitlyn Clark’s exclusion from Team USA sparked heated discussions. Critics, including Molly Camon from “First Take,” argued that Clark’s omission was a mistake and a political move rather than a basketball decision. Initially, Camon claimed Clark was less talented and said her inclusion would be a mockery of the sport. However, as Clark continued to dominate with impressive stats—25-30 points and 10-12 assists per game—public opinion shifted.

Clark’s performance has been exceptional, consistently placing her among the top in assists, scoring, and three-point shooting. Her impact is undeniable, as evidenced by her stats and the team’s success. Despite this, she was overlooked for players like Chelsea Gray and others who were less effective prior to selection. This led to accusations that the decision was driven by factors other than talent.

The criticism of Clark reflects broader issues in the WNBA and women’s sports. Critics argue that the league’s promotion efforts are insufficient if the product isn’t compelling. Clark’s popularity and the attention she brings highlight a critical need for genuine promotion rather than mere marketing.

Stephen A. Smith and others have faced backlash for not supporting the league earlier. Clark’s exclusion from the national team is seen as a missed opportunity for growth, especially given her significant contributions and potential. As Clark continues to excel, her influence suggests she could be one of the greatest players of all time, challenging existing norms and expectations in women’s basketball.