6 Surprise Baltimore Ravens Cut Candidates Ft. Marlon Humphrey, Mark Andrews & David Ojabo

The Baltimore Ravens are entering the offseason with just $8.9 million in cap space, which is not an ideal position for a team looking to remain competitive. While $8.9 million sounds like a lot, in the grand scheme of the NFL, it’s merely a drop in the bucket. That means the Ravens may need to make some tough roster decisions to create additional financial flexibility. Here are six potential surprise cut candidates Baltimore could consider to free up cap space.

1. Marlon Humphrey

This is the most painful name to include on the list, but from a financial perspective, it must be discussed. Cutting Humphrey would save the Ravens approximately $12.7 million in cap space. However, doing so would leave a massive hole in their secondary. Given that Baltimore’s cornerback depth is thin beyond Humphrey and rookie Nate Wiggins, releasing him makes little sense. Humphrey is still an elite corner, allowing a passer rating of just 61.1 last season and tallying five interceptions. His leadership in the locker room is invaluable, and while the financial savings are tempting, Baltimore is more likely to explore contract restructuring than outright releasing him.

2. Mark Andrews

Another star player who carries a significant cap hit is tight end Mark Andrews. His contract accounts for $16 million against the cap in 2025, and the Ravens would only save $1 million if they were to cut him. While releasing Andrews is unlikely, there’s a possibility that the team explores a trade. A recent report suggested the Los Angeles Chargers might be interested, offering a third-round pick (86th overall) in return. With the emergence of Isaiah Likely, Baltimore could consider such a move to gain draft capital while shedding some salary. If Andrews isn’t traded, a contract restructuring remains a viable option.

3. Justin Tucker

While it’s almost unthinkable to part ways with a future Hall of Famer, Justin Tucker’s recent struggles and off-field issues have put him on the chopping block. If the Ravens designate him as a post-June 1 cut, they could save $4.2 million. Tucker’s performance declined last season, and the recent allegations against him have further complicated his standing with the organization. If Baltimore finds a reliable replacement, parting ways with their longtime kicker could become a reality.

4. David Ojabo

Edge rusher David Ojabo was once seen as a high-upside prospect, but injuries have derailed his early career. The former Michigan standout has played in only a handful of games since being drafted, failing to make a significant impact. While he still possesses potential, his $2.2 million cap hit could make him expendable. With the Ravens looking to reinforce their pass rush, they might decide to move on from Ojabo and allocate resources elsewhere.

5. Gus Edwards

Baltimore’s run-heavy offense has leaned on Gus Edwards for years, but with the emergence of Keaton Mitchell and potential draft additions, his $5.6 million cap hit could be tough to justify. The Ravens could save around $4.4 million by cutting him, making it a realistic possibility. Edwards remains a productive runner, but at a premium position like running back, financial flexibility might take precedence over loyalty.

6. Morgan Moses

Veteran right tackle Morgan Moses is another name to watch. While he has been a steady presence on the offensive line, Baltimore could save $5.5 million by releasing him. With younger options like Daniel Faalele waiting in the wings, the Ravens may decide to move on from Moses and invest in cheaper alternatives.

Conclusion

The Ravens find themselves in a tricky cap situation heading into the 2025 offseason. While none of these players are being cut due to lack of ability, financial considerations may force Baltimore’s hand. Humphrey and Andrews seem like long shots to be outright released, but contract restructures or trades remain possibilities. Meanwhile, players like Tucker, Ojabo, Edwards, and Moses could be more realistic cap casualties. As the offseason unfolds, the Ravens’ front office will need to make tough choices to ensure they remain competitive while maintaining financial flexibility.